Hi,

bq. document deletion (outputA)  (outputB)  (outputC) (outputD) (outputE)
I can't reproduce this, please give us more info.
Did you try to see it in latest artifact or trunk?

Regards,
Shinichiro Abe

2016-06-13 11:42 GMT+09:00 Tomoko Uchida <[email protected]>:
> Hi, any suggestions?
>
> Is this a known limitation, or
> should I create a ticket about that?
>
> Thanks,
> Tomoko
>
> 2016-06-09 10:44 GMT+09:00 Tomoko Uchida <[email protected]>:
>> Hello developers,
>>
>> I have sent same message to the user mailing list but there are no
>> reply. Could anyone help me?
>> Some jobs in our customer production environment no longer cannot be
>> deleted for this problem.
>>
>> We are looking for solutions to delete the jobs safely.
>> If my question was not clear, I am ready to provide more detailed 
>> explanation.
>>
>> ----
>>
>> Hello,
>> I encountered an SQLException when I deleted a job with many output 
>> connections.
>>
>> ERROR 2016-06-02 09:41:49,492 (Document delete thread '9') - Document
>> delete thread aborting and restarting due to database connection
>> reset: Database exception: SQLException doing query (22001): ERROR:
>> value too long for type character varying(64)
>>
>>
>> I've found that the error occurred because of ManifoldCF trying to
>> insert long string (more than 64 characters) to 'activitytype' column
>> of 'repohistory' table while deleting documents associated with the
>> job.
>>
>> For a trial, I altered 'activitytype' column type to 'text' by this
>> sentence.
>>
>> ALTER TABLE repohistory ALTER COLUMN activitytype TYPE text;
>>
>> After altering the table I restarted ManifoldCF then the deletion
>> histories was successfully added and the job seemed to be safely
>> deleted.
>>
>> Inserted 'activitytype' values are like this:
>> document deletion (outputA)  (outputB)  (outputC) (outputD) (outputE) ...
>>
>> For application requirements, I cannot limit the number of output
>> connectors (to shorten history records.)
>>
>> Is that OK? Or there are good solutions for that?
>>
>> Thank you in advance,
>> Tomoko

Reply via email to