Hi Piergiorgio, Unless you can think of a technical difference between an "output index connector" and an "output content connector", I don't think it makes sense to introduce a new type of connector for this. It's clear by the target whether it's for content or for an index. For example, a CMIS output connector would obviously not be for building indexes.
What do you mean by "output blockchain connector"? Thanks, Karl On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 4:31 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi <piergior...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I have to confess that many times I wondered if this use case can make > sense in ManifoldCF. > > I mean at an high level Manifold get contents in input and creates search > indexes as the main output. > So it seems that we are addressing a huge swerve in terms of features. > > I totally agree with Rafa and I would like to start the initial > implementation for the CMIS Output Connector. > > I suggest to add a different naming convention for the output connectors > because we will have at least two different types: > > - Output Index Connector > - Output Content Connector > > Or something similar to these I listed above. > > What do you think also about an eventual new type Output Blockchain > Connector? > > Please share your ideas ^__^ > > PJ > > 2016-11-23 23:55 GMT+01:00 Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org>: > > > Indeed, implementations for each repository would be needed. But I can > > ensure this is a quite common use case. So probably it is worth to start > > contributing repository output connectors > > > > Thanks for sharing your opinion Karl! > > El El mié, 23 nov 2016 a las 23:37, Karl Wright <daddy...@gmail.com> > > escribió: > > > > > Hi Rafa, > > > > > > This is not crazy but you really do have to have an output connector > for > > > each repository type you want to push documents into. We have done > this > > > for the filesystem but really for nothing much else, so far. But I see > > no > > > reason it could not be done. > > > > > > The code needed to output documents into a repository is, of course, > > > totally different than the code needed to read from one. > > > > > > Security is a problem you'd once again have to figure out on a > repository > > > by repository basis. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Karl > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 5:09 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I just wanted to share an (almost) random thought I have had from > time > > to > > > > time. In the lasts years, I have faced several migrations between > > > different > > > > ECM systems (for example from Alfresco to Nuxeo). Several times I > have > > > > consider the possibility to use ManifoldCF for this, at the end I was > > > > wondering my self "why not?". My main fear is about permissions > > > > replications from different systems. > > > > > > > > Besides that, what do you guys think about that possibility? > > > > > > > > Maybe creating a new type of output connector ....? Am I completely > > > crazy? > > > > Just wanted to hear your opinions > > > > > > > > Cheers! > > > > Rafa > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Piergiorgio Lucidi > Technology Evangelist @ Sourcesense > Author and Technical Reviewer @ Packt Publishing > Mentor / PMC Member / Committer @ Apache Software Foundation > Community Star / Wiki Gardener / Forum Moderator / Certified Instructor, > Engineer and Administrator @ Alfresco > Top Community Contributor @ Crafter > Project Leader / Committer @ JBoss > http://www.open4dev.com >
