I can easily fix the maven dependency but not the mongodb continued test problems. I fear we will need Piergiorgio to chase down the Windows version of the testing package and include it conditionally based on OS in the ant build. The two artifacts should have different names (in case you switch between the two OS's), and the patched ones should too.
Karl On Mon, May 9, 2022 at 2:15 AM Markus Schuch <markus_sch...@web.de> wrote: > -1 due to some issues that i encountered: > > 1) maven build failed for me: > > > > manifoldcf\framework\core\src\main\java\org\apache\manifoldcf\core\auth\LdapAuthenticator.java:[31,30] > error: package org.apache.commons.lang does not exist > > 2) maven build failed on jenkins > https://builds.apache.org/job/ManifoldCF/job/ManifoldCF-mvn/56/ (not the > same error that i had, but related to velocity - probably caused by 3.) > > 3) maven pom.xml still has a reference to velocity 1.7 > > 4) mongodb integration test fails on Windows: > manifoldcf\connectors\mongodb> ant run-IT-HSQLDB > > Testcase: > > sanityCheck(org.apache.manifoldcf.agents.output.mongodboutput.tests.APISanityHSQLDBIT): > Caused an ERROR > [junit] windows distribution not supported: > PRODUCTION:Platform{operatingSystem=Windows, architecture=X86_32} > [junit] java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: windows distribution > not supported: PRODUCTION:Platform{operatingSystem=Windows, > architecture=X86_32} > > Cheers, > Markus > > Am 09.05.2022 um 02:10 schrieb Karl Wright: > > Please vote on whether to release Apache ManifoldCF 2.22.1, RC0. The > > release artifact can be found at > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/manifoldcf/apache-manifoldcf-2.22.1 > > . There is also a release tag at > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/manifoldcf/tags/release-2.22.1-RC0. > > > > This patch release fixes two problems in 2.22: (1) the new LDAP mapper > had > > the same name as the Regexp mapper, which caused a unique index > constraint > > violation, and (2) there were conflicting versions of Apache Velocity > > installed, which meant that template resolution failed in some cases. > > > > Thanks, > > Karl > > >
