Cor Nouws a écrit : > Charles-H. Schulz wrote: > >> Cor Nouws a écrit : >> >>> Alexandro Colorado wrote: >>> >>>> There was a post on digg explaining what it was actually found and >>>> how did Balmer distorted the news in true Microsoft way: >>>> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1729908,00.asp >>> >>> Interesting, but Nov. 2004. >>> Is this about the same claim(s) ? >> >> Huh, there might have been a problem in the dates, because this article >> is supposed to have been published a few days ago... > > Hmm, all references lead to pages in august / november 2004. > Which doesn't mean that the content is less valid... > just my question: Is this about the same claim(s) ? To me it is... It's about the precise same claim, emanating from the same study...
Best, Charles. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
