Hi John, all,
John McCreesh wrote:
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
[snip]
I would copy the screenshots from the website to the wiki (John, do
you know about their authors and licenses?) and add a link to the
website leading to the wiki.
John, what do you think?
I prefer to use the wiki for 'work in progress' and then copy the final
version to the main website.
OK.
Who will update the main website?
I think we have to provide quite a lot of screenshots
- all program parts
- different features inside these parts
- different OS
People interested in providing some of them might upload them to the
wiki and include it in the wiki page.
Someone has to decide, which screenshots will become "official", someone
has to upload them to the website.
I don't see the necessity to use similar screenshots in different
materials, but if you think concentration to one theme is better, we can
keep official screenshots on the website.
As long as the screenshots at the website don't show a license, they are
not allowed to be included in documentation and marketing material
licensed under an open source license.
Can you provide these license information?
Should we provide an "official" repository at the website and an
"additional" one at the wiki (we do so for "official" and "additional"
artwork in the Art Project)?
That sounds like a good idea. How about also providing 'screenshot
sources' - i.e. the .odt etc files - so that people can port them to
different operating systems, translate to different languages, etc?
This is a real interesting topic. Who might be responsible to define
such sources?
- Marketing?
- Art?
- Documentation?
- ...
Best regards
Bernhard
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@marketing.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@marketing.openoffice.org
