On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Ian <ian.ly...@theingots.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 10:34 -0700, amaloney wrote: >> FSF should butt out. > > FSF has a legitimate political view. There is no reason why they should > not state and support their goals. OOo is also free to exercise its > right to ignore their requests.
Sure, the big issue is if OOo is also ignoring it's own members right to ignore or support such requests. Most OOo people I have asked agree to default to free software, and group the proprietary extensions in their own category listing. > > -- > Ian > Ofqual Accredited IT Qualifications > A new approach to assessment for learning > www.theINGOTs.org - 01827 305940 > > You have received this email from the following company: The Learning > Machine Limited, Reg Office, 36 Ashby Road, Tamworth, Staffordshire, B79 > 8AQ. Reg No: 05560797, Registered in England and Wales. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@marketing.openoffice.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@marketing.openoffice.org > > -- Alexandro Colorado OpenOffice.org Español http://es.openoffice.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@marketing.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@marketing.openoffice.org
