OK, I think we'd need to achieve an agreement on this asp. I'll move the
discussion to the public mailing list.
On 11/12/12 14:29, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Sergio Fernández<[email protected]>wrote:
Anyway, as I reported in INFRA-5624 [3], the project URL still returns
404. But first they need to know [4] if we'll use CMS or svnpubsub-based
site. Not sure if we could change this in the future... but at least I'd
like to put something like "coming soon" there meanwhile we wait until the
other resources (git, jira and so on).
I just had a chat in the #asfinfra about the this issue INFRA-5624
(website) where it is dependent on INFRA-5610 (Git repo). Daniel Shahaf
explained to me that there are three separate things git repos [1], svn
subtree, git mirror of svn subtree [2]. However, svn subtree is mandatory.
We can have code in git repo, site in svn subtree (with a git-svn mirror).
They are waiting for us to provide our choice between CMS and svnpubsub.
About whether we can change it in the future, they said it will double the
work of the infra team so it is better if we can decide the one we want in
the long-run.
Best Regards,
Nandana
[1] - https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
[2] - http://git.apache.org/
--
Sergio Fernández
