Hi, On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> wrote:
> a) CMS-based site [4] > b) svnpubsub-based site [5] > > On the one hand, CMS looks great for maintenance using the bookmarklet, > allowing a more flexible structure far from how code is organized. On the > other hand, besides some bugs I'm pretty sure we can solve, svnpubsub allow > us to use maven site, keeping in that way synchronized public website with > the actual development status. > I didn't get much time to dig into details but AFAIK maven generated site can be used with option a) as well. I think Maven project is doing it that way [1, 2]. Best Regards, Nandana [1] - http://markmail.org/message/ksxhdh3pxc4t5qpp [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5591 [3] - https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/apache_cms_and_external_build [4] - http://maventest.apache.org/
