+1 for monday
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Sebastian Schaffert <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi all, > > I also liked the meetings and I support your suggestion. My preferred > interval would be to have a IRC meeting every week, and otherwise we just > hang around the IRC anyways for any "informal" questions. Time frame: > depends on who will participate, 10:00 CET is maybe a bit early for the US, > but good for all Europeans. Day: I don't really mind, Friday might be good > because of less other meetings, OTOH it is good to start the week with the > meeting and then plan the tasks for the week. :) > > Greetings, > > Sebastian > > > 2013/2/22 Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> > > > Hi, > > > > after the stress for achieving LMF 2.6 and start to actually incubate > > Marmotta, you may noticed this week we didn't do any meeting as we used > to > > do. This is because other commitments, but particularly because the tasks > > we are currently performing (restructuring, renaming and so on) do not > have > > so much to discuss. > > > > But I really liked the result of meetings on IRC, and we'd like to > > continue doing in that way, trying to involve more people. Probably daily > > meetings are not necessary. That's why I'd like to ask the project two > > things: > > > > - What periodicity you think would be better? > > > > - What should be the best time frame for you? > > > > Then we could try to organize a bit more the meeting, calling in advance > > for topics at the mailing list an so on. > > > > Thanks so much for your time. > > > > Best, > > > > > > -- > > Sergio Fernández > > >
