Hi,
On 27/02/13 14:58, Andy Seaborne wrote:
3) Artifacts with licences that are not compatible with the ASF
policies. I know this block a proper Apache release, also a
incubating one?
An incubating release is no different to any other release. There are
only "releases".
So no flexibility. Good to know it, Thanks :-)
Just to note: the headers on the files need to be sorted out but I think
you have the license plugin setup. The exact text is given in:
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
which is the "granted, no copyright" version.
Yeah, we use the maven-license-plugin for that, so I'd just need to fix
this file:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-marmotta.git;a=blob;f=parent/src/etc/header.txt;h=2100354c73ef10dd38a804f515de4783cb22a722;hb=HEAD
Which you are right, it uses the copyright version.
There's a tool help:
http://creadur.apache.org/rat/
Yes, we used RAT for the reports discussed in this and previous threads.
Great tool, indeed. I just realized that it does not correctly handle
dual licensing, but that's something easy to manually check.
Are any files exceptions (i.e. third party source code)?
There is not third-party Java code. The most conflictive one would be
the Javascript libraries, which I'm looking for a long-term sustainable
solution, probably switch all libraries to WebJars; further ideas would
be welcomed ;-)
Cheers,
--
Sergio Fernández
Salzburg Research
+43 662 2288 318
Jakob-Haringer Strasse 5/II
A-5020 Salzburg (Austria)
http://www.salzburgresearch.at
