2013/3/15 Sebastian Schaffert <[email protected]>: > Only the BSD code licensed under the old (original) BSD license with > advertisement clause requires such notice (see > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html). All code we included is > published under the New BSD license without advertisement clause, so they > are not added to NOTICE. Is this incorrect?
I think its correct. So are there any notices beside the default one required at all for the source release? > I copied this over from > > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html > > (Bundling Permissively Licensed Dependencies) > > where it says that for MIT license and for 3-clause BSD (i.e. without > advertisement, or "New BSD") the pointer is sufficient. How did you handle > this in your projects? Was not aware of that, thanks! I always thought that you need the original license text without any exceptions. So, in this case I think you are fine. Cool :) -- Fabian http://twitter.com/fctwitt
