I quickly check for other projects with similar issue, and the solution they adopted to solve CAMEL-1765 (just do not use it) is not valid for us.

On 21/03/13 10:43, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
Hi Nandana,

I take back my suggestion, because the OneJar license says:

"Including this file inside the built One-JAR file conforms with these terms."


The Maven OneJar plugin automatically adds the license to the jar file
(in the doc/ subdirectory). So this should at least be enough for the
OneJar people. Is it also ok for the ASF?


Greetings,


Sebastian



2013/3/21 Sebastian Schaffert<[email protected]>

Hi Nandana,

thanks for pointing this out. Actually these files are added by the Maven
OneJar Plugin, which builds the jar file for the LDPath CLI. I was not
aware that it adds additional source files to the jar file that are not
from the project. To solve this issue, I propose that I create a new
release build including the license that you pointed out. Do you think it
is necessary to again restart the vote afterwards?

Greetings,

Sebastian


2013/3/21 Nandana Mihindukulasooriya<[email protected]>

Hi all,

Kudos for all the hard work pushing forward the release and sorry for not
being able to check and provide feedback earlier on. I am a bit stuck
catching up stuff after one week of travelling.

One question, ldpath-3.0.0-incubating.jar (inside
apache-marmotta-3.0.0-incubating-ldpath.tar.gz) contains some source files
from http://one-jar.sourceforge.net/. Was this intentional ?

I find no reference to one jar licence in the LICENCE.txt

Best Regards,
Nandana

[1] - http://one-jar.sourceforge.net/one-jar-license.html


On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Fabian Christ<
[email protected]
wrote:

2013/3/20 Fabian Christ<[email protected]>:
Summary vote: 0 (for the moment) because I am unsure about the rat
check. At least I am not really convinced that the license headers are
fine in all cases.

After the very constructive discussions on the RAT topic I came to the
conclusion that the podling is handling the license headers in a
profound way.

Therefore, I withdraw my previous +0 vote and vote with +1 for the
release.

--
Fabian
http://twitter.com/fctwitt




--
Best Regards,
Nandana Mihindukulasooriya





--
Sergio Fernández
Salzburg Research
+43 662 2288 318
Jakob-Haringer Strasse 5/II
A-5020 Salzburg (Austria)
http://www.salzburgresearch.at

Reply via email to