On 28/03/13 14:29, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
Hi Andy,
you are right, the header should not be there (and the NOTICE file also
mentions the MIT license correctly). The reason why this was automatically
added is probably that the file did not have its own license header before.
I begin regretting a bit the use of the license header plugin ...
:-|
Sergio, can you please re-check all 3rd party source files whether they
have been updated by the plugin incorrectly?
Looks like every case can be different (very) :-(
How about we draw up a list of modules and split the task of checking
each one. A discussion and process on dev@ for the community.
We're suffering because of the various levels and interpretation of how
3rd parties apply license info.
(I am wondering about putting a NOTICE/LICENCE in every included
dependency then no need to put in top level N&L. Other mentors - thoughts?)
Andy
Greetings,
Sebastian
2013/3/28 Andy Seaborne <[email protected]>
platform/marmotta-sparql/src/**main/resources/web/admin/**editor/sparql/
flint-editor.js
has the Apache contributed software header on it. It says it's under a
contributor license agreement but it's not is it?
Flint is recorded as MIT-licenced
(Other flint-originated files seem to be the same.)
Has automation accidentally relabelled it?
Has this happened elsewhere?
Andy
