Since now I think we are is a much better position, I'll continue
working on the weekend to finish this stuff. and probably on Monday
we'll be in the position to try the RC6.
BTW, this has taken longer than expected, so we'd also need to take a
look what things from the develop branch could be merged to master for
having those fixes already in the release.
Have a nice weekend!
Cheers,
On 05/04/13 10:05, Sergio Fernández wrote:
Hi Andy,
On 05/04/13 09:51, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Looks good to me - as Nandana, slightly more than necessary but I do
agree that a single audit point is useful (and there is prior usage in
other projects).
Exactly. I found very useful to collect all there. So I think I'll keep
it in that way.
the licnese do not have to be incuded in LICENSE, a link to the licence
is sufficient for permissive licenses, as per the text in
#permissive-deps.
That's true, #permissive-deps says that pointers are sufficient. Our
current approach is pretty inspired by how CouchDb does it:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/trunk/LICENSE
But if you find LICENSE too long we could switch to just pointers, to
the source tree or to its web URL. I'll wait for more comments.
Thanks!
Cheers,
--
Sergio Fernández
