On 5 June 2013 02:33, Sergio Fernández <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > in Marmotta we inherited from the underlined RDF API (Sesame OpenRDF) the > term "context" for referring to triple containers with their own URI. > > There are several other terms for referring same thing: graph, named > graph, quad, etc; actually in the former KiWi were known as "knowledge > spaces". Moreover we have a terminology issue with the statement @context > in LDPath. > > So, since we are still in the moment where such core concepts could be > renamed, do you thing we should do it? > > Personally I'd be happy to switch to graph, but I'm also fine with the > current term. > > Thanks in advance for your comments. >
@context is also now overloaded by JSON-LD. Another slightly broader option that SPARQL uses is "Dataset" [1]. Cheers, Peter [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-query/#rdfDataset
