[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MARMOTTA-260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13691672#comment-13691672
]
Peter Ansell commented on MARMOTTA-260:
---------------------------------------
There is also a bug in the logic for RdfJsonParser right now:
if(subjectKey.startsWith(HTTP)) {
subject = new URIImpl(subjectKey);
} else {
subject = new BNodeImpl(subjectKey);
}
should be similar to:
if(subjectKey.startsWith("_:")) {
subject =getValueFactory().createBNode(subjectKey.substring(2));
} else {
subject = getValueFactory().createURI(subjectKey);
}
Directly calling the URIImpl and BNodeImpl constructors is not as useful (or
accurate in terms of bnode identity management) as reusing the ValueFactory
that is specified.
> Remove sesame-tools-rio-rdfjson in favour of sesame-rio-rdfjson
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MARMOTTA-260
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MARMOTTA-260
> Project: Marmotta
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Sesame Tools
> Reporter: Peter Ansell
> Assignee: Sebastian Schaffert
>
> I wrote a streaming Jackson based RDF/JSON parser (sesame-rio-rdfjson) that
> could be used as a replacement for the sesame-tools-rio-rdfjson parser.
> There is also a writer, which also uses Jackson, but doesn't use the same
> method as the current writer implementation. Feel free to contrast the two
> writing methods if the current sesame-rio-rdfjson is not as performant.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
