[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MARMOTTA-272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13712701#comment-13712701
]
Sergio Fernández commented on MARMOTTA-272:
-------------------------------------------
I have to say that the specification has significantly improved. Personally I
still have some questions, particularly about LDPCs, but now it is not the
right time to put them on the table...
So here some minor comments from my side about the last draft to send to the WG:
4.1.8 "LDPR server responses must use entity tags (either weak or strong ones)
as response ETag header values.": I do not remember the concrete resolution of
this issues, but I'd prefer to say SHOULD until a standard ETag calculation
would be specified. And this would be aligned with 4.4.2.
4.2.3: Here I miss a reference to RFC 2616 Section 12 (HTTP/1.1 Content
Negotiation).
4.9.2 I think custom page size is out of the spec, so I'd add something "Page
size MAY be decided by LDPR servers". The same could be applied for the name of
the parameter to retrieve concrete pages: p, page or whatever.
5.3: Personally I find the explanation a bit difficult to read and understand.
But since I have no better proposal, I'm fine with it. Maybe, adding a new
paragraph saying something like "LDPC results ordering MUST be as defined by
SPARQL SELECT’s ORDER BY clause [SPARQL-QUERY]" would allow to simplify some of
the point in that section.
5.3.1: I'd change the link to the example ("as in the example") to refer the
concrete example, I think example 6.
5.10: I need more thinking about this feature. In case of open questions, I'd
prefer to keep out.
> LDP drafts for review in preparation of W3C Last Call
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MARMOTTA-272
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MARMOTTA-272
> Project: Marmotta
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Dissemination
> Affects Versions: 3.0-incubating
> Reporter: Sergio Fernández
> Assignee: Sergio Fernández
> Fix For: 3.1-incubating
>
>
> In the call today the WG has agreed on move the latest draft to last call
> next week:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Jul/0059.html
> So we must take our time for reviewing it:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ldp-wg/2013Jul/0059.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
