+1 I think it's a good plan to discuss these changes. On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 6:03 PM Lucas Bonatto Miguel <lucasb...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi, > > As the current version of Marvin is not getting enough traction in both > usage and development, some action needs to be taken. After discussing with > a few stakeholders, we believe that the scope of the problem Marvin is > trying to solve should be simplified. One of the ideas that I would like to > propose is for us to remove some parts of the code, related to training and > inference execution in production, and instead generate packages that can > be executed by other de-facto platforms out there, argo, kfp, tecton, tfx, > etc. > > I have no doubts that this would simplify the codebase immensely, and in > addition, it would make Marvin useful for more people, by taking advantage > of this new integration layer. > > If enough people are interested in this change, I suggest we schedule a > meeting to kick off the ideas for this RFC. > > Please respond with +1 or -1 > > Best, > Lucas >
