On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 10:20, Michal Maczka wrote: > I am thinking about deploying java sources and javadocs to repository. > > Any idea about naming convention of those artifacts? With maven-new it > will be easy to control, with maven-old it is not so easy. > > I am thinking about: > > /${groupId}/apis/${artitifactId}_api-${version}.jar (for javadocs) > /${groupId}/srcs/${artitifactId}_src-${version}.jar (for sources). > > Any better ideas? > > Other question is where is the best place for such functionality? > I think for javadoc it is javadoc plugin. But for sources?
Isn't the "dist" plugin doing the job already? [dist] : Build a complete distribution. build ...................... Build a complete distribution. build-bin .................. Build the binary distribution. build-setup ................ Set up directories for a distribution build build-src .................. Build the source distribution. deploy ..................... Deploy a distribution deploy-bin ................. Deploy a binary distribution deploy-snapshot ............ Deploy a snapshot distribution deploy-src ................. Deploy a source distribution prepare-bin-filesystem ..... Builds the binary distribution file system. prepare-src-filesystem ..... Builds the source distribution file system. > javadoc:archive > java:src-archive ... dist plugin IMHO builds "zip" archives, which are more suitable than jar e.g. for javadoc. just my 2 cent -- Martin Skopp Riege Software International GmbH Support: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Information: http://www.riege.com This email is intended to be viewed with a nonproportional font. Public Key on http://www.keyserver.net, Key-ID: 3D4027B5 Fingerprint: 1970 C78D 9A1D 99FA 5CE4 5C0D 29E6 6A95 3D40 27B5 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]