On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 08:14, Rafal Krzewski wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > After a discussion on IRC with Jason this afternoon I've volunteered to > > roll back CVS Head so it has the pre-refactor code + the changes since, > > until Jason can spend some more time on getting the refactor working with > > all the plugins. > > > > Does anyone have a problem with rolling back the refactor? > > This is really bad news. Porting changes back and forth between the > branches is a always a waste of effort.
Yup. I didn't want to check in my stuff until I had worked on it further but a couple folks wanted to see if ended up not understanding it and it has indeed been a wasted effort. > The time needed to do that > could be spent better on fixing the problems in HEAD. Yes, but I'm tired of fighting the "I want it now!" mentality. I will quietly get everything working and test it before I check things in again. > If there is pressure however to have beta 11 released without the > memory leak plugged up, a MAVEN_BETA_11 branch could be sprouted > at the point of pre refactoring tag, and as many bug fixes as possible > would be ported there. You have much experience with branches and this sort of thing and we could probably learn from your experiences. Do you want to head this up seeing as you wrote the branches documentation that we have. > R. > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
