The following comment has been added to this issue: Author: dion gillard Created: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 1:16 AM Body: Ok, I'm convinced. Type is a uniqueness qualifer. --------------------------------------------------------------------- View the issue:
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=MAVEN-194 Here is an overview of the issue: --------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: MAVEN-194 Summary: Two dependiencise having the same id but diffrent type should not be assumed as duplicats Type: Bug Status: Reopened Priority: Major Time Spent: Unknown Remaining: Unknown Project: maven Fix Fors: 1.0-final Versions: 1.0-beta-8 Assignee: Jason van Zyl Reporter: Michal Maczka Created: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 10:22 AM Updated: Mon, 4 Aug 2003 12:56 PM Description: Currently in case of following dependincies in POM: <dependencies> <dependency> <id>mydep</id> <version>1.0.1</version> <type>war</type> </dependency> </dependencies> <dependencies> <dependency> <id>mydep</id> <version>1.0.1</version> <type>jar</type> </dependency> </dependencies> only the first dependency will be availabe in dependency list. Solution: Both "id" and "type" should be used in org.apache.maven.project.BaseObject and two dependincies should be assumed as equal only if dep1.id == dep2.id && dep1.type == dep2.type --------------------------------------------------------------------- JIRA INFORMATION: This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]