Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 14/08/2003 11:25:55 AM:

> The marshaller/unmarshaller is already there, its just a matter of 
modifying
> the affected stuff. I'll have a look at doing that depending on the 
need.
Cool.

I think we'll need that for the memory leak. Jason would know better than 
me on that one.

> One thing I noticed was the unit tests for all of project's getters and
> setters generated by Jdoclet using values that aren't really valid 
filenames
> - is that really necessary?
Nope.

> I'd be happy to replace them with more useful unit tests that check the
> basedir stuff is working when it is in place.
Feel free to make the tests better, that's the worst part of the code at 
the moment.

--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog:      http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/

Reply via email to