Florin, are you seriously telling me you used head AFTER the refactoring code dump? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
"Florin Vancea" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/08/2003 08:43:14 PM: > Sorry for bumping in, but I'm exactly midway between user and developer, the > kind that uses HEAD. > > I was using HEAD until not-so-long ago, mostly for Cactus plugin reasons. > And I luckily obtained a version that is satisfactory for me right before > the HEAD/STABLE split, then I stopped building regularly, but that was just > due to lack of time. > > I myself would love to have back an ongoing HEAD as good as it was 'til > July. And this is a praise, not a critic, please understand me. > > Florin > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Maven Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:17 AM > Subject: RE: cvs commit: maven/src/plugins-build/cactus/xdocs changes.xml > > > > > > > However, we're not making it nice for all those other people working > > > from CVS HEAD. I have been working a Maven user for the past 2 years and > > > I can tell you the 2 projects that I have used it on are using CVS HEAD > > > version (there's no other solution as the stable release are always > > > missing something and the plugins have not been decorelated from the > > > core). > > I'd love to know how many people are actually working from CVS head at > > this point. Last week, my guess would be that it was just me and noone > > else had even bootstrapped with the refactored code, there were so many > > problems. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
