[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Are we all in agreement that the next release should happen pretty soon,
>and be called 1.0-beta-11?
>I'm +0 on that name vs 1.0-RC1, as we know we aren't adding new
>functionality.
>Any objections/vote now?
>Here's my +1.
Please, please, please, please, please, please, please apply the patch
in MAVEN-690 before tagging a new release.
It's a royal pain to build Turbine with _any_ maven snapshot and it
would be great to have at least one "officially released" version that
is actually able to build Turbine (this is the project that spawned
maven, remember? ;-) ).
The only thing that's missing for this is in MAVEN-690, I even sent a
patch with descriptions that only needs to be applied.
All that it got was to be buried in a bug tracking system and not to
be looked at again. And got scheduled for "1.1" which is
ridiculous. If the maven developers thinks so, they can as well rip
out the torque-plugin because it's non-functional in its current
state.
So I'm (non-binding vote) -1 for a release without MAVEN-690 applied
and +1 for a release with it applied.
Please. I'll buy you a beer on ApacheCon.
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services
freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
"Dominate!! Dominate!! Eat your young and aggregate! I have grotty silicon!"
-- AOL CD when played backwards (User Friendly - 200-10-15)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
