Jason van Zyl wrote:
...
I would just like to avoid the complete arbitrary nature of the gump
descriptor when it comes things that are generated from a project.
In Centipede we use the Gump descriptor for the artifacts, and we
had the same need of having to extend it to specify the artifact type.
Hence I agree with this. From the Gump perspective having arbitrary
artifacts is ok, but for systems that automate things it's vitally
important that artifact types are clearly defined.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
