> -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Walding [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 14 November 2003 03:08 > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Make groupId mandatory for POM version 4? > > +1 to fixing that >
[snip] > > <groupId> / <artifactId> +1 > > Whatever the solution, i'd prefer that the dependency definition and the > POM definition were equivalent. > me too > > What kind of deprecation period were you planning? It's deprecation in java code. However in POM code there's a new version of the POM (version 4). So it's not deprecation for the POM, simply a new one. I think we need to keep supporting POM3 at least until 1.1 final included. [snip] -Vincent --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
