Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 24/11/2003 09:14:02 AM: > On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 17:08, Brett Porter wrote: > > I'd like to go ahead with the CVS move soon, but a couple of things need to > > be sorted out: > > > > - any -1's to the plan? Anyone else +1? Currently just myself, Vincent and > > Jason have commented. > > - should the remaining plugins be moved first or not? If not, they can be > > moved for 1.1. > > I would like to move them first and change the bootstrap because I would > like to start working on 1.1. > > > > > Currently, there is a tag on HEAD to indiciate the branchpoint. It contains > > everything on HEAD except the POMv4 changes. > > > > Cheers, > > Brett > -- > jvz.
I'm +1 on the branches. I'm +1 on moving the plugins first. I also think we need some more discussion on what's going on, as I can see from the current progress that I am going to have to back-port 1.1 only stuff to work under 1.0, e.g. multichanges etc. I really don't want to have to keep two sets of code in synch for that long. Also, the branching needs to happen to both maven and maven-plugins modules in CVS, right? Which plugins are currently 1.1 ONLY? -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
