Hi Vincent, Yes, that is a good practice. I split changes.xml so that the right changes went on the right branch. I didn't add any entries for the stuff that I merged which was done by others. I will add comments to the version on the branch soon about the changes made to the contexts, and that should merge to HEAD fairly cleanly.
Cheers, Brett > -----Original Message----- > From: Vincent Massol [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, 26 November 2003 11:03 PM > To: 'Maven Developers List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: CVS changes > > > Brett, > > Very cool. I haven't checked yet but have you been careful > about adding information to the top level changes.xml file so > that we know what has been added in 1.1 vs 1.0? It would be a > good practice that committers use this file I think. > > Thanks > -Vincent > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 26 November 2003 13:00 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: CVS changes > > > > Hi, > > > > Just a brief not to let everyone know I've done the CVS > branch switch. > > All changes for 1.0 need to go on the MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH branch, while > the > > 1.1 free for all can take place on CVS HEAD :) > > > > I'll turn my attention to repairing the remaining reactor > bugs on the > > branch next week. > > > > Cheers, > > Brett > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
