On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 12:06, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On Mon, 2003-12-01 at 10:29, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > ... > >>Not that Maven should necessarily move to Forrest for documentation, but > >>it can be a nice alternative. In fact I have already stylesheets that > >>can render Maven docs in Forrest, so it would really not even change the > >>current setups. > > > > Nobody has a problem with a Forrest plugin for those that want to use it > > but I would never promote it as the default doco tool. > > That's exactly what I am asking :-) > > Since some time back some asked for it, if someone wants to help us with > a Maven plugin you are welcome.
It's also a lot easier now for plugin developers because it's now simple for a project to use plugins that come from anywhere. So it would be simple to integrate the use of Forrest for projects that wanted to use it. -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
