On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 17:36, Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi all,
>  
> There seems to be some confusion over the current branches.
>  
> Inactive:
> MAVEN_RC1_REFACTOR - Jason's initial attempt, no longer builds or
> maintained.
> MAVEN_RC2_UNSTABLE - my work, since moved and branch closed.
>  
> Active:
> MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH - my work, and what should go live for Maven 1.0
> HEAD - Maven 1.1.

Ok, now I'm even more confused. Where did the working code go that was
in HEAD before the switch-a-roo? 

 
> State of MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH:
> bootstraps, but has bugs. Not recommended for any end users.
> Please do not recommend this on the maven-user list (or even the -dev list)
> - recommend they get the RC1 release. There is nothing they need in CVS
> HEAD.
>  
> If they want newer plugins, they can use that CVS repository.
>  
> Incidentally, I have closed in much more on the particular bug that has been
> plaguing me - it is not the reactor as I first though, but the attainment of
> multiple goals in one werkz project. I think I have it nailed. That leaves
> just the classloader issues and some tidy up before we get stable again.
>  
> Cheers,
> Brett
>  
-- 
jvz.

Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tambora.zenplex.org

In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it.
  
  -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to