Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/01/2004 03:50:17 PM: > On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 00:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 05/01/2004 02:45:13 PM: > > > > > On Sun, 2004-01-04 at 22:27, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > dion 2004/01/04 19:27:17 > > > > > > -1 unless you have tested every plugin that you've changed and have > > > tested it. If so then I withhold my -1. If all the plugins are actually > > > fine then fine. > > > > Since it's physically impossible to test all plugins, I'm rolling them
> > back out. > > This is why an individual test harness is required so that the developer > of the plugin can do it. We cannot make unilateral decisions across > plugins that we're not responsible for. There are 'test harnesses' in the form of test projects for several plugins. They get run as part of the bootstrap build on the 1.x branch. They all passed. > > Someone who wants to do it your way can happily test them all. > > I will start tomorrow. Great. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
