Sounds good. Thanks Mike. I'll try and get the current code cleaned up ASAP so you can test multiproject:site. You can probably get away with it if you disable checkstyle, pmd, simian and tasklist as they are the ones that have the issues, and if you don't do anything abnormal like maven does with touchstone :)
The branch is MAVEN-1_0-BRANCH, bootstrap is still the same old ant one. Good luck. Cheers, Brett > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Melia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, 21 January 2004 10:23 AM > To: 'Maven Developers List' > Subject: RE: Description of fixes to memory leak > > > I'm checking out the branch now. I'll report any quirks I find. > > I'm happy for transitive deps to NOT be part of 1.0, I > understand that a bit more thought needs to go into the use > case for general use and that will not be until 1.1. > I can carry on with my patch satisfying my own use case for now. > > Cheers, > Mike > > ______________________________ > Mike Melia > ThoughtWorks Inc > http://www.thoughtworks.com > mikemelia AT thoughtworks.net > mmelia At thoughtworks.com > y! : Michael_A_Melia > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, 21 January 2004 10:06 AM > > To: 'Maven Developers List' > > Subject: RE: Description of fixes to memory leak > > > > The CVS version works now for everything except running the > site in my > > opinion. Give it a bash - if you find bugs, put them in JIRA (but > check > > the > > roadmap for RC2 first to see if they aren't already there). > > > > I think I posted to the transitive dependencies: I'm not sure we can > add > > that to 1.0. I'd have to relook at the issue to see what I said :) > > > > Cheers, > > Brett > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Mike Melia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Wednesday, 21 January 2004 10:02 AM > > > To: 'Maven Developers List' > > > Subject: RE: Description of fixes to memory leak > > > > > > > > > Brett, > > > the patches have already been submitted - I think one > will be part > > > of 1.0 Final and the other (transitive dependencies) will > be part of > > > 1.1. > > > > > > I will wait until next week for the branch to become > stable and use > > > that. Can you give me a shout when (in your opinion) it > is, more or > > > less, stable. I've got 50+ projects to build and the > > > multiproject:site goal blows up 640M after 28 of them :( > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Mike > > > > > > ______________________________ > > > Mike Melia > > > ThoughtWorks Inc > > > http://www.thoughtworks.com > > > mikemelia AT thoughtworks.net > > > mmelia At thoughtworks.com > > > y! : Michael_A_Melia > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Brett Porter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, 21 January 2004 9:36 AM > > > > To: 'Maven Developers List' > > > > Subject: RE: Description of fixes to memory leak > > > > > > > > Mike, > > > > > > > > You've got no hope. To remove the leak required the complete > > > restructuring > > > > that is on the branch. > > > > > > > > What patches do you have, and can they be incorporated into > > > Maven for > > > > others benefit? > > > > > > > > As an aside I've made additional fixes to the branch > and now have > > > > everything working except for some classloader issues when > > > running the > > > > xdoc > > > plugin > > > > test > > > > under the reactor because of multiple versions of httpclient on > the > > > > classloader. I think this is a simple fix, and with further tidy > up, > > > the > > > > branch should be stable from some time next week. > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Brett > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Mike Melia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, 20 January 2004 6:07 PM > > > > > To: 'Maven Developers List' > > > > > Subject: Description of fixes to memory leak > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Folks, > > > > > I know you've been applying fixes to the multiproject memory > leak > > > > > problem and I would like to incorporate those fixes if I > > > can. I am > > > > > reluctant to use the 1.0 RC2 branch as I have patches of > > > my own that > > > > > I would like to keep easily. Does anyone have a couple of > > > minutes to > > > > > spare to describe the changes made to fix the leak? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________ > > > > > Mike Melia > > > > > ThoughtWorks Inc > > > > > http://www.thoughtworks.com > > > > > mikemelia AT thoughtworks.net > > > > > mmelia At thoughtworks.com > > > > > y! : Michael_A_Melia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > > > > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
