Write up your proposal and start a separate thread for it... no hijacking ;-)
On 21 June 2014 15:48, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: > At the risk of redundancy, my favorite was the scm element. We > implement or consider all kinds of nasty kludges to sneak scm-specific > information through the tiny funnel of the current schema. It should > be possible to extend the pom for cases like this without all the > angst about 'breaking tools that read poms.' Whatever else is true of > pom 5, it should, I claim, have a documented extensibility strategy > that forces such tools to deal gracefully with incremental additions. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
