instead of removing info in the matrix comparison [1], I would have preferred 
to just add a notice that the 2 other systems are out of date (or any better 
explanations that I read on the ML, IIRC)

There are compatibility issues with Maven version that are reguarly told on 
the ML that should be IMHO added in a dedicated documentation page.

nothing blocking, just improvements ideas to help people use more such tool 
(which is not a shiny end-user feature, so I know how hard it can be to 
maintain it...)

so here is my +1 too

Regards,

Hervé

[1] http://maven.apache.org/plugin-testing-archives/LATEST/

Le mardi 8 juillet 2014 15:58:40 Igor Fedorenko a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> We solved 4 issues:
> http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11740&version=200
> 39
> 
> There are no issues left in JIRA
> 
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1039/
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1039/org/apache/mave
> n/plugin-testing/maven-plugin-testing/3.2.0/maven-plugin-testing-3.2.0-sourc
> e-release.zip
> 
> Source release checksum(s):
> maven-plugin-testing-3.2.0-source-release.zip sha1:
> 53bf150ffb13ba07a76748cbe8103530fd4465d9
> 
> Staging site:
> http://maven.apache.org/plugin-testing-archives/LATEST
> 
> Guide to testing staged releases:
> http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html
> 
> Vote open for 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to