Le jeudi 24 juillet 2014 23:54:44 jieryn a écrit : > Agree! I thought I saw Jason doing these, but recently it seems anyone > can say it is a Maven Developer Hangout. Notice that it's true: anybody can do a Maven Developer Hangout, the same way anybody can do a Maven Developer Talk in a place or conference, or a Maven Developer Discussion at a Coffe Machine It's nothing "official", it's just a way for some people around the world to share ideas, questions, parts of solutions, in a direct way and immediate feedback
> > I am confused about this most recent update. I like the last one, because it's the spirit I expect: open discussions on open topics about Maven for everybody. And it reminds, if anybody were confused, that these hangouts were never thought as the official Maven 4 plan workplace: neither official, neither limited to Maven 4, but clearly useful to have individuals envision how they'll be able in the future to propose to desgin and/or implement something or help someone else to do it. Topics can be so complex that before having something written, discussion is useful And really thank you to Manfred for having posted a summary to the list: that will give the most benefits to the whole comunity, since we're having the Hangout extend to the mailing list Notice that if anybody wants to organize another Hangout at another schedule, or use another tooling, in the same spirit, they can and we'll encourage it If it is recorded and accessible on the web, I'll add it to the Wiki page (and probably will need to rename it and extend the text, since it won't be only about Hangout tooling and thursdays). Maven community has a lot of diversity: it's great. And it's great to have multiple ways to keep it alive. Regards, Hervé > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:50 PM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]> wrote: > > Question about these hangouts... are they about anything related to Maven? > > I thought these were to focus on 4.0 enhancements. Perhaps I > > misunderstood; > > it looks this week's topics were mostly private company infrastructure > > stuff. > > > > > > Cheers, > > Paul > > > > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Manfred Moser <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all! > >> > >> We had another interesting and productive developer hangout today. > >> > >> The following topics were discussed and raised: > >> > >> - new release of progressive-organization-pom available > >> https://github.com/simpligility/progressive-organization-pom > >> > >> - new release of Android Maven Plugin 3.9.0-rc.3 > >> https://code.google.com/p/maven-android-plugin/ > >> > >> - we talked about issues with Maven plugin testing tools and Maven > >> verifier based tests, > >> Igor has a new implementation of verified based testing in the works that > >> supports > >> testing with multiple Maven versions, running IT tests as part of normal > >> project > >> (without multi module setup and/or without install of plugin, instead > >> using > >> reactor/workspace resolution, works on command line and in M2e), Android > >> Maven plugin > >> will try to migrate to that as a solution to the required refactoring > >> see also https://github.com/jayway/maven-android-plugin/issues/303 > >> > >> - Herve mentioned that he is hoping to start enforcing checkstyle as part > >> of the > >> > >> build from the parent pom, we discussed benefits of complete reformat in > >> > >> one sweep > >> vs gradual migration/enforcement, Herve will send update with more > >> details > >> to the list, > >> we agreed to move forward with some sort of enforcement, potentially with > >> a property to > >> turn it for so that projects can opt out even if they update to the new > >> parent release > >> with the enforcement > >> > >> - we talked about a desire to have one checkout to easily work on lots of > >> Maven > >> related projects like svn/trunks has now and how we could do that in git, > >> the > >> android repo tool as well as some other git based approaches were > >> mentioned > >> but there is no current setup, some people dont see the need for this, > >> others > >> feel its very important, users will have to come up with something > >> > >> Feel free to post follow ups with what you want to mention as well > >> > >> manfred > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
