And, included with a "provided" scope we're not forcing these annotations on anyone. But they do give marvelous IDE support :)
Kristian 2014-09-22 18:32 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold <kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com>: > Yeah, it seems to me like they just abandoned the JCP but kept the > name. So "dormant" refers to the JCP project, not the actual findbugs > module we're talking about here, which has a decent release frequency. > > Kristian > > > 2014-09-22 18:19 GMT+02:00 Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org>: >> Just so everyone knows, JSR 305 is in "dormant" status. Whatever >> annotations you use aren't "standard" annotations since the JSR never >> completed. >> >> >> Cheers, >> Paul >> >> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Kristian Rosenvold < >> kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> <dependency> >>> <groupId>com.google.code.findbugs</groupId> >>> <artifactId>jsr305</artifactId> >>> <version>3.0.0</version> >>> <scope>provided</scope> >>> </dependency> >>> >>> The reason for this is that the findbugs project has been evolving >>> these annotations at a pace, and I would now also like to use >>> @CheckForNull, @CheckReturnValue, @OverridingMethodsMustInvokeSuper, >>> @WillClose and @WillNotClose. >>> >>> (CheckReturnValue makes it an error NOT to check the return value, >>> which is good for immutable classes...) >>> >>> I think these annotations are particularly valuable in shared code >>> (maven-shared and all of plexus). >>> >>> Kristian >>> >>> >>> 2014-09-22 18:10 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold < >>> kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com>: >>> > Some time ago, we discussed using the JSR305 annotations. At the time we >>> > discussed @Nonnull and @Nullable, and it turned out that those two >>> > annotations are "named based" in most analysis-tools; you can make your >>> own >>> > org.apache.maven.annotations.Nonnull/Nullable and have a reasonable >>> chance >>> > of having tools pick them up. Both findbugs and IntelliJ support this >>> > approach. We sort-of concluded that this would be the optimal approach, >>> and >>> > since then we promptly did nothing about it :) >>> > >>> > I'm very happy that we didn't do anything about it, since I'd now like to >>> > re-propose that we actually use >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
