Chiming in late here. Where does "Couché-tard" come from and what does it mean? How is it relevant?
I read one of Stephen's earlier posts where the colourisation V was questions. Stephen's response was the wrong one: Would you prefer the A? My response is: why colourise or stress any of them? I don't get the significance. On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Stephen Connolly < stephen.alan.conno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Stop calling Couché-tard "shotgun owl"! > > Does this make it clearer that it's a feather patch: > > http://people.apache.org/~stephenc/maven-logo-contest/maven-owl-4-large.png > > On 19 November 2014 21:19, Dan Rollo <danro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Looks great! Before reading the comet below, I had the same “shotgun” > > thought about the white chest patch. Would it help if the white oval > moved > > up, and started at the scarf? (Basically the top of the oval hidden under > > the scarf?) > > > > Understood about the “design by committee”. > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > From: Andreas Gudian <andreas.gud...@gmail.com> > > Subject: Re: New logo? > > Date: November 19, 2014 at 12:49:59 PM EST > > To: Maven Developers List <dev@maven.apache.org> > > > > > > I like it. Cute but resolute birdy, and the font looks fresh and modern. > > > > But wait - did someone shoot a hole right through the owl? You can even > see > > the shadow behind it. ;-) Maybe the patch in the middle could be a little > > darker, perhaps with a hint/tint of the surrounding colour? > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > >
