Stephen Connolly wrote:

> I think we can add whatever states we want.
> 
> These are not Backlog though
> 
> They are perhaps "Stale" or "Inactive/Unconfirmed"
> 
> Just need a label that communicates the ticket as closed due to no
> response and no clear report"

Incomplete ;-)

> 
> On Wednesday, November 26, 2014, Chris Graham <chrisgw...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> RTC uses Backlog. Does Jira have something similar?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 27/11/2014, at 8:13 AM, David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Retired rather than Archived?
>> >
>> > This cleanup seems like a really good idea :-)
>> >
>> > david jencks
>> >
>> > On Nov 26, 2014, at 12:41 PM, Paul Benedict <pbened...@apache.org
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> My 2-cents on the word "Archived" is that it's a synonym for
>> >> Backup/Storage, which I don't think is what this process is about.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Paul
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Michael Osipov <micha...@apache.org
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Am 2014-11-26 um 16:16 schrieb Paul Benedict:
>> >>>
>> >>>> This email is related to thread "Abandoned bug analysis" [1].
>> >>>>
>> >>>> We have done the Great Ticket Cleanup of 2014 twice this year. It
>> >>>> has really been productive for anyone who triages outstanding bugs
>> >>>> and enhancements. We've been adding a note in the ticket, as a
>> >>>> courtesy
>> to the
>> >>>> participants, and closing them as "Won't Fix".
>> >>>>
>> >>>> This is certainly one valid way of accomplishing the goal. However,
>> >>>> I
>> do
>> >>>> believe we should enhance our workflow by adding an "Abandoned" (my
>> fav)
>> >>>> or
>> >>>> "Archived" resolution. Why? Because "Won't Fix" is typically is used
>> to
>> >>>> close out a bug that will never be fixed (i.e., too many people rely
>> on
>> >>>> the
>> >>>> bad behavior) or the enhancement is deemed worthless or incorrect.
>> >>>> But more
>> >>>> importantly, it's not possible to do a JIRA search and distinguish
>> between
>> >>>> these two conditions unless a new resolution is introduced.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> We need two new things:
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Status: Awaiting Feedback (not just labels).
>> >>> 2. Resolution: Archived
>> >>>
>> >>> Michael
>> >>>
>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
>> <javascript:;>
>> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>> <javascript:;>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>> <javascript:;>
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org <javascript:;>
>>
>>
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to