Job removed, so the spam has ended.
I haven't removed the branch, though.
Op Thu, 08 Jan 2015 12:37:15 +0100 schreef Jason van Zyl <ja...@takari.io>:
I would say not. While I'm breathing the chances of log4j2 getting used
in core is zero.
On Jan 8, 2015, at 6:32 AM, Robert Scholte <codeh...@sourcegrounds.com>
wrote:
Do we still need this job?
If so, let's try to fix it.
Robert
Op Thu, 08 Jan 2015 12:07:40 +0100 schreef Apache Jenkins Server
<jenk...@builds.apache.org>:
The Apache Jenkins build system has built
core-integration-testing-maven-3-jdk-1.6-log4j2 (build #1001)
Status: Still Failing
Check console output at
https://builds.apache.org/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-jdk-1.6-log4j2/1001/
to view the results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder, Apache Maven
http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
http://twitter.com/takari_io
---------------------------------------------------------
A language that doesn’t affect the way you think about programming is
not worth knowing.
-- Alan Perlis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
