Ouch that's an old one :-) Yes I was interested to have a 2.3 release but we failed to find the motivation/time to close 431
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 4:12 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> wrote: > I didn't work on this one for a long time > > Anders and Arnaud seem to have problems to decide how to fix and close > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ARCHETYPE-431 > > Regards, > > Hervé > > Le mardi 3 février 2015 21:50:00 Benson Margulies a écrit : > > So, I've committed changes to the archetype system that I believe > > correspond to the 2.2.1 level. What else wants to happen before a > > release? > > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY <herve.bout...@free.fr> > wrote: > > > Le lundi 2 février 2015 12:42:02 Karl Heinz Marbaise a écrit : > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> after some discussions at FOSDEM with Hervé, Kristian and Robert in > > >> Brussels i will summarize some ideas we would like to share here: > > >> > > >> Make a final release of all plugins with minium Maven 2.2.1 > > >> (prerequisites) and Java 1.5 > > >> > > >> The current state of this approach can be watched on the dist-tool [2] > > > > > > page. > > > > > >> After that we can start making releases of the plugins which have > > >> minimum Maven 3.0 and JDK 6 (I think this will bring many cleanups in > > >> code etc.) > > >> > > >> To make this more clear for the users the plugin versions should be > > >> bumped to 3.0....independant from their current version. > > >> > > >> This approach gives us the possibility to make in case of real bugs > bug > > >> fix releases of the older plugins for JDK 5 etc. without confusion JDK > > >> 5/JDK6 etc. > > >> > > >> These are the steps to leave Maven 2 completely behind..Yeah ;-) > > >> > > >> Currently we have two (three) exceptions maven-site-plugin (some kind > of > > >> special case), maven-scm-publish-plugin and maven-shade-plugin which > > >> already have the Maven 3 requirement. > > > > > > more precisely, IMHO, we'll need to document 2 exceptions: > > > 1. plugins that are already at version 3.x but do not require Maven 3: > > > maven- site-plugin, maven-plugin-plugin, maven-pmd-plugin, > > > maven-compiler-plugin 2. plugins that require Maven 3 with version < > 3.0: > > > maven-scm-publish-plugin and maven-shade-plugin > > > > > > And we'll need to add a documentation in every plugin that changes its > > > requirements to remember to end-users which is the last version that > > > requires Maven 2 > > > Perhaps something to add to maven-docck-plugin > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Hervé > > > > > >> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40maven.apache.org/msg102539.html > > >> [2] > > >> > https://builds.apache.org/job/dist-tool-plugin/site/dist-tool-prerequisit > > >> es. html > > >> > > >> > > >> Kind regards > > >> Karl Heinz Marbaise > > >> > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > > -- ----- Arnaud Héritier http://aheritier.net Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com Twitter/Skype : aheritier
