I'm not actually sure of what problem you're trying to solve here. On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Mirko Friedenhagen < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > we now have pushChanges and localCheckout in the release:prepare goal. > IMO pushing commits and tags after a successful release:perform or > release:stage would be a good thing then, as this will probably > succeed most of the times. > > I have a real problem with the word 'probably' here. As there will always be times when that is not the case, when things fail. Sometimes on a permanent basis, sometimes a temporary failure. What appears to be the case here, is that we've come up with a proposed solution to a problem that I have no clear idea about. Can someone please elaborate? > What do you think about something like pushChangesAfterPerform? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
