Sure thing, I'll update pull request.
Thanks for reminding.

2015-08-02 21:00 GMT+03:00 Robert Scholte <[email protected]>:

> Even though the changes seem too simple, I'd like to see unittests to
> prevent this from happening again.
> I don't mind writing them.
>
> Robert
>
> Op Sat, 01 Aug 2015 17:05:37 +0200 schreef Anton Tanasenko <
> [email protected]>:
>
>
> I've created yet another PR for MNG-5805:
>> https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/62
>> Sorry guys, I was certain I had run m-enforcer-p its as well with 3.3.5
>> candidate.
>>
>> 2015-08-01 16:57 GMT+03:00 Anton Tanasenko <[email protected]>:
>>
>> Oh not again,
>>> The LifecyclePhase#toString() method was added by me along with
>>> toLegacyMap.
>>> Looks like I didn't take care of 'mojos' field possibly being null. This
>>> seems to be happening when an extension specifies a lifecycle phase but
>>> doesn't assign any mojo executions to it.
>>>
>>>
>>> 2015-08-01 16:08 GMT+03:00 Karl Heinz Marbaise <[email protected]>:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> +0 from me...
>>>>
>>>> Reference Documentation updated (http://maven.apache.org/ref/3-LATEST/)
>>>> ..
>>>>
>>>> checked with maven-invoker-plugin, maven-install-plugin, with Maven
>>>> itself ;-)...
>>>> and with some of my own projects without any issue...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately i have found an issue with maven-enforcer-plugin
>>>> (trunk:r1693704) where two integrations test are failing with Maven
>>>> 3.3.6
>>>> which do not fail with Maven 3.3.3...
>>>>
>>>> I have attached both log files...
>>>>
>>>> Maven Enforcer accesses methods in maven-core which are marked as
>>>> deprecated...(based on indirect changes):
>>>>
>>>> This has been added with 3.3.6...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ./maven-core/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/lifecycle/mapping/LifecyclePhase.java
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The following is called indirectly...
>>>>
>>>>     @Deprecated
>>>>     public static Map<String, String> toLegacyMap( Map<String,
>>>> LifecyclePhase> lifecyclePhases )
>>>>     {
>>>>         if ( lifecyclePhases == null )
>>>>         {
>>>>             return null;
>>>>         }
>>>>
>>>>         if ( lifecyclePhases.isEmpty() )
>>>>         {
>>>>             return Collections.emptyMap();
>>>>         }
>>>>
>>>>         Map<String, String> phases = new LinkedHashMap<>();
>>>>         for ( Map.Entry<String, LifecyclePhase> e:
>>>> lifecyclePhases.entrySet() )
>>>>         {
>>>>             phases.put( e.getKey(), e.getValue().toString() );
>>>>         }
>>>>         return phases;
>>>>     }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So the culprit seemed to be this line:
>>>>
>>>>             phases.put( e.getKey(), e.getValue().toString() );
>>>>
>>>> where e.getValue() could be null...but they are not the problem.
>>>>
>>>> The problem is located in the toString() method of LifecyclePhase:
>>>>
>>>>    @Override
>>>>     public String toString()
>>>>     {
>>>>         StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
>>>>         boolean first = true;
>>>>         for ( LifecycleMojo mojo: getMojos() )
>>>>         {
>>>>             if ( first )
>>>>             {
>>>>                 first = false;
>>>>             }
>>>>             else
>>>>             {
>>>>                 sb.append( "," );
>>>>             }
>>>>             sb.append( mojo.getGoal() );
>>>>         }
>>>>         return sb.toString();
>>>>     }
>>>>
>>>> The call to getMojos() is the real problem cause the call to
>>>> "toLegacyMap()" is a static method without relationship to the object
>>>> instance which could explain the non existings content of getMojos()...
>>>>
>>>> This looks to me that maven-enforcer needed to be fixed...But WDYT ?
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards
>>>> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 7/31/15 5:41 AM, Jason van Zyl wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Time to release Maven 3.3.6!
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is a link to the issues resolved:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12316922&version=12333058
>>>>>
>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1201/
>>>>>
>>>>> The distributable binaries and sources for testing can be found here:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1201/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.3.6/
>>>>>
>>>>> Specifically the zip, tarball, and source archives can be found here:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1201/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.3.6/apache-maven-3.3.6-bin.zip
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1201/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.3.6/apache-maven-3.3.6-bin.tar.gz
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1201/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.3.6/apache-maven-3.3.6-src.zip
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/maven-1201/org/apache/maven/apache-maven/3.3.6/apache-maven-3.3.6-src.tar.gz
>>>>>
>>>>> Source release checksum(s):
>>>>> apache-maven-3.3.6-src.zip sha1:
>>>>> ae409472561584c50691e672539b3eb0f11e806a
>>>>>
>>>>> Staging site:
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~jvanzyl/maven-3.3.6/
>>>>>
>>>>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1
>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>> [ ] -1
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> The Maven Team
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards
>>>> Karl Heinz Marbaise
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Anton.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Anton.

Reply via email to