On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]> wrote:
> That's how it use to work, but that requires a double voting process: vote
> once on the RC and then again if the RC is ready for production. It's
> easier to just burn the numbers; if it fails, move to the next; otherwise
> you release what you have.

There's an advantage that I think you might be missing. When you vote
an RC, it becomes a formal release, and you can advertise it to the
user community for testing, which might get you more testers than you
get on the dev@ list.


>
>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>
> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Anders Hammar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> That's how Maven core releases were done in the early v3.0.x days.
>> Personally I think it worked very good.
>>
>> /Anders (mobile)
>> On Nov 15, 2015 15:40, "Benson Margulies" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> > Given the number of 'burned' releases recently, I thought people might
>> > be interested in hearing about an alternative approach.
>> >
>> > When a Lucene dev has a sudden urge to make a release, he or she set
>> > up a release with a version of x.y.z-RC1. This is a real release. It
>> > goes up for a vote.
>> >
>> > If there's something grossly wrong with it, the RM burns it and tries
>> > again with RC2, etc.
>> >
>> > If it passes the vote, the user community (not just the dev community)
>> > is invited/exhorted to test it for a bit. Problems are repaired. If
>> > the fixes are significant, then the the next step is another RC. When
>> > an RC is clean, or manifests only tiny problems, the RM goes ahead and
>> > puts up x.y.z for a vote.
>> >
>> > The result of this is that a non-RC release hardly every gets burned.
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>> >
>> >
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to