Am 2016-12-26 um 14:02 schrieb Hervé BOUTEMY:
I'm ok with "flacky tests" vs "flacked tests"
I'm ok that "tests in error" is not the best description, but "erroneous
tests" does not convince me...
If I look at how JUnit itself report issues, which is IMHO the origin of this
description, JUnit 3 made the distinction between "failures" and "errors"
What about just removing "tests" and get a consistent descripton in all cases?
Sounds good:
error( "Errors: " ),
failure( "Failures: " ),
I would do a subsequent commit with changes, if no one objects.
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
