On 2017-11-12T15:15:49 +0100
"Robert Scholte" <rfscho...@apache.org> wrote:

> MJAVADOC-475 is about replacing a parameter, which makes it as critical as  
> MJAVADOC-457.
> We just consider 3.0.0 to be THE version to be able to do a cleanup, hence  
> MJAVADOC-475 must be fixed as well.
> 
> The good news is: MJAVADOC-457 and MJAVADOC-475 are finished. I don't see  
> any deprecated parameters anymore.
> 
> MJAVADOC-499 is a too dangerous proposal for me. So I don't mind moving  
> that issue forward, it is not critical for 3.0.0, there is a workaround  
> (or preferred solution depending on who you ask) for this issue.
> 
> Which means I can prepare the release this week.
> Just need to ensure all CI servers still accept the changes.

OK, thanks!

I look forward to it.

-- 
Mark Raynsford | http://www.io7m.com

Attachment: pgp71b_cipRhU.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to