On Fri 12 Jan 2018 at 19:21, Karl Heinz Marbaise <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > I think the following build jobs can be deleted as well: > > 1. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-2.2.x/ > 2. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.0.x/ > 3. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.x/ > 4. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-ant-tasks/ > 5. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-archetype-m2/ > 6. > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3/ > 7. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-pipeline-test/ > 8. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3/ > 9. > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3-windows/ > 10. > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.0.4/ > 11. > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.0.5-with-maven-plugin/ > 12. > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.1.x-with-maven-plugin-jdk-1.8/ > 13. > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.1.x-with-maven-plugin-jdk-1.8_windows/ > 14. > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-ITs-m3.2.1-with-maven-plugin-jdk-1.7/ > 15. > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins-windows/ > 16. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-pipeline-test/ > 17. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-shared/ > 18. > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-shared-windows/ > 19. > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.2-release-status/ > 20. > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.2-release-status-build/ > 21. > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-3.2-release-status-test/ > 22. > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-solaris/ > 23. > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-osx/ > 24. > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-jdk-1.8/ > 25. > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-jdk-1.7/ > 26. > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/core-integration-testing-maven-3-jdk-1.6-windows/ > 27. > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-scm-provider-svnjava/ > 28. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-scm/ > 29. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-scm-windows/ > > > I would delete the above jobs at Saturday 20. January of 2018...if no > one has objections about it... > +1 from me > > > A. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-plugins/ > => I don't know why so many other projects are triggered by that Job? > any idea about that? It’s *evil* job type so will pick up SNAPSHOT triggering. > B. > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-wagon-benchmarks/ > Is this needed? If yes ? I think if we want something like this we should set up a job for this by using a specific branch with a custom Jenkinsfile (or a separate repo) I’d say hold off on this until we figure out what it’s doing. > C. https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-wagon-jetty8/ > Any idea? No clue! > > D. > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-wagon-jetty8-windows/ > > Any feedback / information would be great.. > Well the new jobs are on a matrix of OSes so “in theory” we shouldn’t need a Windows specific job any more... but given we do t know about C above... > > Kind regards > Karl Heinz Marbaise > > On 12/01/18 19:57, Karl Heinz Marbaise wrote: > > Hi, > > > > now I found another one which I have removed. > > > > The old build Job: > > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-indexer-5.x/ > > > > The new one: > > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wip/job/maven-indexer/ > > > > So I have deleted that job.. > > > > Kind regards > > Karl Heinz Marbaise > > > > > > On 30/12/17 19:34, Robert Scholte wrote: > >> Yep, if you can confirm the jobs are covered by the TLP Jenkins > >> script, then they can be removed. > >> I don't think there's a reason to keep the historic statistics. > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> Robert > >> > >> On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 19:14:34 +0100, Karl Heinz Marbaise > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> based on the new Jenkinsfile based Builds I will delete step by step > >>> older jobs for example: > >>> > >>> https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-enforcer/ > >>> > >>> cause we have now as replacements.. > >>> > >>> > https://builds.apache.org/view/M-R/view/Maven/job/maven-box/job/maven-enforcer/ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Any objects about that? > >>> > >>> Kind regards > >>> Karl Heinz Marbaise > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Sent from my phone
