Let's see if I have to send a new email. The release notes, deployment and SHA1 are related to right version. Only the title is bad.
On Sat, Mar 3, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you ! > I will test on my company projects as soon as possible (maybe monday). > > nit: is The subject of the vote thread wrong ? > > Enrico > > > 2018-03-03 12:44 GMT+01:00 Tibor Digana <[email protected]>: > >> The e-mail went out. The vote has started. >> Should I mention how to run the build with other JDK and follow the >> README.md on GitHub? >> >> On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 8:16 PM, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Il ven 2 mar 2018, 19:43 Tibor Digana <[email protected]> ha >> scritto: >> > >> > > I will close the Jira Version and I will complete all preparation for >> the >> > > release vote tomorrow morning. >> > > >> > >> > Great! >> > Enrico >> > >> > > >> > > On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 6:02 PM, Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > I see SUREFIRE 1491 is on master, eo we have a green light? >> > > > Thank you Tibor >> > > > >> > > > Il gio 1 mar 2018, 22:38 Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> ha >> scritto: >> > > > >> > > > > Ok Sounds good. >> > > > > But could we just focus on a new release rather than new issues? >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On 1 March 2018 at 14:20, Tibor Digana <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > There is a branch SUREFIRE-1491 waiting for pushing to master. >> It >> > is >> > > > open >> > > > > > for everybody who want to check it: >> > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=maven-surefire. >> > > > > > git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/SUREFIRE-1491 >> > > > > > Here is the Jenkins build link >> > > > > > https://builds.apache.org/job/maven-wip/job/maven-surefire/ >> > > > > > job/SUREFIRE-1491/ >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Cheers >> > > > > > Tibor >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:24 AM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Hi >> > > > > > > Inline >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On 1 March 2018 at 12:55, Tibor Digana < >> [email protected]> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Hi Olivier, >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Please do not make it yet - I am in progress with fixing. >> > > > > > > > I am still running several branches on Jenkins. The Jira >> issues >> > > in >> > > > > > 2.21.0 >> > > > > > > > match branch name, as for instance today's SUREFIRE-1491. >> > > > > > > > After 1491 the next ones will be cosmetic changes - quite >> fast >> > to >> > > > do. >> > > > > > > > I would like to start the vote in the weekend. So we have >> been >> > > > > working >> > > > > > > with >> > > > > > > > Robert Scholte and me quite a lot on this release, please >> let >> > us >> > > > > finish >> > > > > > > it. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > I don't mind doing myself the release. I don't have any need >> > > neither >> > > > > pay >> > > > > > > any attention of of having my name attached to a release!! >> > > > > > > I just want to get this done ASAP. As a user (a non friendly >> one >> > in >> > > > > this >> > > > > > > case :-) ) I'm very disappointed to not be able to test my >> > projects >> > > > > with >> > > > > > > jdk10. >> > > > > > > So I'm simply rocking the boat to get this done! >> > > > > > > So if you prefer doing the release by yourself please do it! >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Then 3.0.0-M1 would be yours, Olivier and most probably >> > everybody >> > > > > would >> > > > > > > > appreciate new API and Java 1.7 including me. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > In the next release 3.0.0-M1 we can cherrypick and squash >> > commits >> > > > > from >> > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > existing branch 3.0-rc1 together and you Olivier can make a >> > > > release. >> > > > > > > > The JUnit Users would expect release of our new provider >> asap, >> > so >> > > > we >> > > > > > have >> > > > > > > > to cherrypick and squash commits from branch junit5 in >> Version >> > > > > 3.0.0-M2 >> > > > > > > and >> > > > > > > > add a statement to documentation saying that JUnit5 has >> > > incomplete >> > > > > > > > feature-matrix against JUnit47 and we call it experimental >> > > provider >> > > > > > > because >> > > > > > > > we do not have all feature ITs covered. >> > > > > > > > Both (3.0-API and JUnit5) are actually very urgent, so they >> > > should >> > > > > > follow >> > > > > > > > right after current Version 2.21.0. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > Sure so we don't have to delay 2.21.0 >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Why M1, M2, etc, because we with Kristian and Andreas >> wanted to >> > > > > change >> > > > > > > the >> > > > > > > > system properties of config params to something like >> surefire.* >> > > and >> > > > > > > > failsafe.* and include interfaces to some config params with >> > > > > > > > "implements=..." which would customize the plugins without >> > asking >> > > > us >> > > > > to >> > > > > > > do >> > > > > > > > in ASF. Some prototype was done but it did not go with >> > > > > > "implements=...". >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Additionally, we have to release 3.0.0-M3 with reworked >> > > > communication >> > > > > > > > between processes (maven -> surefire) because the execution >> > hangs >> > > > > with >> > > > > > > > pipes and I found a bug in JDK in maven-shared-utils. We >> have >> > > some >> > > > > > > > prototype with sockets but pipes must stay as an config >> > > > alternative. >> > > > > > This >> > > > > > > > includes changes in the data format sent over pipes and >> sockets >> > > > which >> > > > > > is >> > > > > > > on >> > > > > > > > my PC and not in any public branch. With this fix we will >> close >> > > all >> > > > > > known >> > > > > > > > critical Jiras. >> > > > > > > > I could not do it earlier, sorry. There's been a quite a >> lot of >> > > > > > > > requirements so far from Users and us ASF. >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Cheers >> > > > > > > > Tibor >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 12:14 AM, Olivier Lamy < >> > [email protected]> >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hi >> > > > > > > > > Any objections to cut a release? >> > > > > > > > > If not, I can do this early next week >> > > > > > > > > Cheers >> > > > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > > > Olivier Lamy >> > > > > > > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > -- >> > > > > > > Olivier Lamy >> > > > > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > Olivier Lamy >> > > > > http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >> > > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- Enrico Olivelli >> > > > >> > > >> > -- >> > >> > >> > -- Enrico Olivelli >> > >> > >
