Hi Robert, I manually moved the changes and created [1]. Hope, that I didn't miss a file. The included test case still runs successfully.
While moving the files I noticed that the main sources of the test project has no external dependency. I don't think that's an issue, but I'm not sure about it. Cheers, Christian [1] https://github.com/apache/maven-compiler-plugin/pull/4 On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 9:32 PM, Robert Scholte <rfscho...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Christian, > > could you base your commit on https://github.com/apache/mave > n-compiler-plugin ? > I know this is a long standing with to do whitebox testing, even though > some others JPMS experts don't agree ;) > My comment did indicate i had no idea at that time what to do with it, so > maybe this is the right fix to support all combinations. > > thanks, > Robert > > On Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:42:44 +0200, Christian Stein <sormu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi everybody, >> >> I filed a PR against AbstractCompilerMojo and TestCompilerMojo some days >> ago [1] and would like to discuss it. The PR introduces support for test >> sources organized as modules and solves the inline comment reading " // >> maybe some extra analysis required " in the TestCompilerMojo. >> >> A successfully running test case using JUnit 4 as an automatic module is >> included in the PR. >> >> Cheers, >> Christian >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/maven-plugins/pull/139/files >> >