yes, on our 100 Git repos [1], 90% should be easy to run on any CI with 
minimum configuration and resources

then there is Maven core and complex plugins (like Surefire) which are not the 
same story

if someone wants to test other toolings to show some useful feature we don't 
get in our current ASF Jenkins configuration [2], just start with some 
examples of the base 90% and make a demo of something that would be useful to 
add to our configuration

Regards,

Hervé

[1] https://maven.apache.org/scm.html#Maven_Sources_Overview

[2] https://github.com/apache/maven-jenkins-lib

Le mercredi 2 janvier 2019, 15:38:12 CET Enrico Olivelli a écrit :
> Il giorno mer 2 gen 2019 alle ore 15:34 Vladimir Sitnikov
> 
> <sitnikov.vladi...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > Enrico> For instance maven-surefire
> > integration tests take 2 hours.
> > In general I see Travis (free edition) does not offer many resources.
> > 
> > Each Travis job is limited by 50 minutes, however one can split tests into
> > multiple jobs, so it will run fine.
> 
> I guess it won't be easy.
> Maven integration testing is very complex, it's Maven launching Maven
> itself. We will need to improve maven-invoker plugin, I don't know if there
> is support for something like JUnit categories.
> We can run only "unit tests" and this will be a minimal "feedback" for
> the contributor.
> For simpler plugins, like "checkstyle", I think Travis would be a good
> choice, at least I would give it a try
> 
> Enrico
> 
> > Vladimir
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org

Reply via email to