Thanks Tomo for the heads up. I will move the patch forward.
Enrico Il giorno mar 14 mag 2019 alle ore 22:08 Tomo Suzuki <suzt...@google.com.invalid> ha scritto: > Hi Enrico, > > The PR https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/pull/52 has been approved > (Thanks!) but not merged yet. > Is this something you can take care of, or should I take any action? > > Regards, > Tomo > > *From: *Tomo Suzuki <suzt...@google.com> > *Date: *Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 12:15 AM > *To: *Maven Developers List > > Enrico, > > > > Created the PR. https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer/pull/52 > > > > Regards, > > Tomo > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 5:17 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Awesome > >> Let's see the PR > >> > >> Thanks > >> Enrico > >> > >> Il mer 13 mar 2019, 22:19 Tomo Suzuki <suzt...@google.com.invalid> ha > >> scritto: > >> > >> > Hi Maven developers, > >> > (following "Contributing" section of maven-enforcer-plugin > >> > <https://github.com/apache/maven-enforcer#contributing>) > >> > > >> > I'm thinking to raise a PR to fix an issue below, so that > >> > maven-enforcer-plugin can work with maven-resolver-util without > explicit > >> > "exclusion" element. Let me know what you think! > >> > > >> > While writing a custom enforcer rule, I encountered NoSuchMethodError > >> > org.eclipse.aether.util.ConfigUtils.getFloat. I believe it is caused > by > >> > transitive dependency in org.eclipse.aether:aether-util. The class is > >> also > >> > in org.apache.maven.resolver:maven-resolver-util:1.3.1. A workaround > >> with > >> > exclusion element > >> > < > >> > > >> > https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/cloud-opensource-java/blob/master/enforcer-rules/pom.xml#L64 > >> > > > >> > just worked fine for me but I'd like to contribute to fix the root > >> cause if > >> > possible. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Regards, > >> > Tomo > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Tomo > > > > > -- > Regards, > Tomo >
